<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Experience Sampling on Sara Weston</title><link>https://sarajweston.com/tags/experience-sampling/</link><description>Recent content in Experience Sampling on Sara Weston</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sarajweston.com/tags/experience-sampling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The stability of intraindividual means and standard deviations of affect</title><link>https://sarajweston.com/publication/shryock-stability-2025/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sarajweston.com/publication/shryock-stability-2025/</guid><description>Using two experience sampling studies with a one-year gap, we asked how many observations per person it takes for average emotion and emotional variability to look like stable traits. Averages did so with a modest number of observations, variability much less so.</description></item><item><title>On the Trait Like Nature of Emotion Regulation Dynamics: Limited Evidence</title><link>https://sarajweston.com/publication/shryock-trait-2024/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sarajweston.com/publication/shryock-trait-2024/</guid><description>In an experience sampling study repeated one year later, average emotion regulation strategy use was fairly consistent over time, but measures of how much it varied or flexed were not.</description></item></channel></rss>