<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Electronic Health Records on Sara Weston</title><link>https://sarajweston.com/tags/electronic-health-records/</link><description>Recent content in Electronic Health Records on Sara Weston</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sarajweston.com/tags/electronic-health-records/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reconsidering what is vital about vital signs in electronic health records: Comment on Matthews et al. (2016)</title><link>https://sarajweston.com/publication/condon-reconsidering-2017/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sarajweston.com/publication/condon-reconsidering-2017/</guid><description>A short commentary on an Institute of Medicine committee&amp;rsquo;s recommendations for which psychosocial measures belong in electronic health records. We argue the criteria are too restrictive and the process needs broader input.</description></item></channel></rss>